User Login    
 + Register
Who's Online
17 user(s) are online (9 user(s) are browsing Articles)

Members: 0
Guests: 17

more...
  News Total Articles : 20  
on 2012/2/1 14:57:32 (5 reads)

The United States has Free Trade Agreements (FTAswith many countries--Australia, Singapore, Israel, Morrocco, to nave a few. Soon there will be an FTA with Korea.

FTAs with each beneficiary country are identical in some ways and significantly different in others.

One commonality among the FTAs is that the imported product must be fully produced in the FTA country or, if made in whole or substantial part from foreign materials, that the foreign materials had been "substantially transformed" there. Documenting this can be difficult. A recent Customs survey found that 28% of the claims for free entry under the FTAs were not properly documented. This resulted in the retroactive loss of the duty exemption and in some cases penalties as well as the curtailment of an otherwise highly successful import program.

Often, the importer is not sensitive to its exposure. It may have been importing goods duty-free under an FTA for years without any objection or question from Customs. Then a request for production documentation for a specific (usually recent0 shipment is made and it is found that the factories did not maintain sufficient records.

Production documentation is often extensive--for some products, running to more than one hundred pages. Few importers find it practical to require them for each shipment, even though it is the importer's obligation to maintain records justifying the claim for free entry. Rather, the importers request it of the manufacturers when the request comes from US Customs. Only then is it learned that the factories' documentation is insufficient.

For starters--and this is far from the only measure you should take to minimize exposure to an unexpected duty assessment or more--we suggest that if you import under an FTA , you request production documentation from each factory you use for a recent shipment from it--- and require as a contractual matter that such documentation--if your review satisfies you that it is sufficient--be provided for any other shipment within 30 days of request.

Please regard this as a general informational message. It is not advice that will insure that you qualify under an FTA or anything near an exhausive listing of measures you should take to protect your company.

    Article ID : 36

More releases in News
  Legal Services Total Articles : 10  
on 2008/9/8 18:00:00 (1739 reads)

C-TPAT

To increase security against the use of incoming containers to smuggle in contraband and implements of terrorism, Customs initiated the C-TPAT in 2001. Specific legislation covering the program was enacted in 2006.

    Article ID : 1

More releases in Legal Services
  About Total Articles : 1  
on 2008/9/21 23:50:00 (1970 reads)

About Zelman & Associates

Customs and International Trade law firm, lawyers and attorneys representing importers, exporters, brokers, freight forwarders, steamship lines, and airlines with respect to C-TPAT, valuation, tariff, classification, audits, marking, record keeping, requirements, import, export, duty, exemptions, duties, drawback, licenses, penalties, fines, currency seizures, seizure, copyright, trademark, rulings, and litigation.



Zelman & Associates

Stephen M. Zelman, Esq.

888 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10106

Call: +1.212.245.6100

stephenzelman@gmail.com


Zelman & Associates is a New York based boutique law firm featuring principal attorney Stephen M. Zelman, who practices customs law and serves as a trade regulation consultant. He advises importers and others dealing with US Customs and other government agencies that regulate imported merchandise.

    Article ID : 14